Who "they"misled you into worshipping by historical and linguistical manipulation of the “ Bible ”
Words consist of phonemes( units of sound uttered). Yeshua and Joshua are related as they are the words that correspond to the Saviors name. Jesus and Iesous are related in that they correspond to the pagan's god of healing.One group is the one and only true name of the son of God. The other can only be the name of the Pagan's deity. This"variant" spelling was not done by evolvement of language or by accident.
Transcription is one thing. Translation ,another . And so again with interpretation . Because of the many different languages phonemes(sounds) may be transcribed(represented) differently by variant symbols.
Linguistics; Transcribed :To represent (speech sounds) by phonetic symbols.
Now the phonetic symbols may vary from language to language but the speech "sounds” always remain the same.Unless your language doesn’t contain that sound or it is not “heard” or recognized. This is very significant when we are evaluating the bible sources and materials . There are many different sources as to where these materials originated . Others predate others by centuries(but that does not mean that at sometime they were not linguistically and historically manipulated). For example ; The Greek Septuagint recorded in 300B.C. http://studybible.info/LXX_WH/
"The [Greek]Septuagint was in use during the apostles lifetime and although originally written 300 years prior, the original Greek grammer had not changed. The apostles wrote the name of Joshua using same Greek spelling that the Jewish(Judean) sages used in writing the Septuagint.Now those believing the name Jesus(Yeshua) to be a Medieval variant of the name Joshua will not have a hard time refuting this assumption. Archived Medieval works of literature are quite plentiful for reference. I have included a English bible translation of the name Joshua from the 13 century and an American engraving from the 17th century to span the English use of the name Joshua.As you can see Joshua manages to read exactly the same for a mere One Thousand Seven Hundred years! So now you must ask when did the Greek Joshua of the New Testament suddenly become something different and who made the switch? " http://www.yeshuaekklesia.com/Joshua.html
In the Greek Septuagint,which dates to the year 300 BC, it shows the name Yeshua (Joshua) in the Book of Joshua as " ιησοι". It sounds like "Ee su". Here it is in Greek Caps:ΙΗΣΟΥΣ. Now follow the link and listen : http://translate.google.com/#el|en|%CE%B9%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%BF%CF%85
To your right, in the images, you will see evidence that Yeshua, Joshua and ,who we now know as, "Jesus" is written in the greek characters " ιησοι "(phonetically sounds like "Ee Su" ,just as in the Book of Joshua here.... http://studybible.info/LXX_WH/Joshua
They won't transliterate it into Joshua even in Greek for the name is Holy. The characters in Greek sound like Esu, with a long "E". The characters look like this and sound like "ya shew a" in Hebrew יהושע
Now try for yourself finding the greek characters for these phonemes and see what it looks like. It might look closer to this ... Ιο ο Σοεο " Y Aw Se Aw". Why was it not wirtitten like this in Greek? Well, in Greek, the name Yeshua(Joshua) is spelled in Greek Caps as "NAYH",which sounds phonetically like "Ye shew a".The phonemes in a name always stay the same in any language. "Ee Sees" and " Ya shew A" sound nothing alike phonetically. Want to hear what Joshua written in Greek sounds like phonetically? Follow this link and click on "Listen" http://translate.google.com/#el|en|%CE%9D%CE%91%CE%A5%CE%97
Because they wanted you uttering the name Esu,Isis. For pronounce it as it was spoken in it's actual language. "Ee Sees"
And Yeshua name is also not "IHCOY", as in here http://scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/NTpdf/mat2.pdf
The basic units of sound,Phonemes, also have a usual common meaning across the spectrum of languages.
But as to Yeshua's name...let's look at the Hebrew and English equivalent. Breaking down the word into phonemes...Yah = God , Shua = Savior
Which almost corresponds with the transliteration IAH (Yah) minus the "U" plus ShUA. Yahusha carries the syllable in the wrong place..
It's not IaHUShUA "Yah Hu Sha" but YESHUA "Yah Shew A". Big difference in context and meaning.
The name Yehoshua has the form of a compound of "Yeho-" and "shua": Yeho- יְהוֹ is another form of יָהו Yahu, a theophoric element standing for the personal name of God YHWH, and שׁוּוֹשֻׁעַ shua‘ is a noun meaning "a cry for help", "a saving cry" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua_(name)
The problem with the word/anogram "YHWH" is that it's not the name of God. It is "Ehyeh asher Ehyeh", which does not mean "I am that I am" but "I shall become who I am becoming", the former be stagnant and complacent the latter being moving and living...the God of the living. Go here and see the Hebrew and distorted English interpretation . http://scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/exo3.pdf (14)
Now lets look at the phonetic name of Yeshua in the Hebrew scriptures.Remember that Yeshua translates to Joshua,
As you can see the phonetic is closer to Yeshua..."IEUSHO" from "their" phonetic transliteration.
Be careful with the incorrect implication that Jesus transcribes from Yeshua from the Greek IESOUS ,(name) under "Original name for Jesus" . It doesn't. IESOUS is the name of the greek female God of healing. Pronounce it out...it's "Esus", not "ye shew a". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua_
The etymology of the word "Christ". It comes from the word Chrestos (χρηστ ό ς )which means Cretan,not "good". Some would translate it as "Good". Either way, it(Chrestos) does NOT mean "anointed". But Mashiach means "anointed"....there is quite a difference ,contextually.
Iesous(Greek god) Chrestos( good) is not anything like Yeshua (Joshua=God's Salvation) ha (the) Mashiach( the anointed of God), linguistically or historically. Which title better fits Yeshua? The good god of healing? Or rather ,"God's anointed Savior"?
According to Realencyclopaedie, the inscription "Chrestos" is to be seen on a Mithras relief in the Vatican.(I've seen the relief) Osiris, the sun-god of Egypt, was revered as Chrestos -- as was Mithra.
"Jesus" is derived from IESOUS, a pagan god of healing, and not from "Yeshua",which was the saviors name, which would translate into Joshua in English. .Yeshua ha Mashiach, Joshua the anointed.
Where does IESOUS come from? Koster states that "Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon " associates the "healing god" Iesous with the "healing goddess" Ieso. A Greek god.
"According to Wörterbuch der Antike, the substitute name can be traced back to the Latin Iesus and the GreekIesous.
Then, it can be traced back to an adaptation of the name of the Greek healing goddess Ieso. TheGreek-English Lexicon of Liddell and Scott, confirm this.
To the Greeks ,who venerated a healing goddess, Ieso, a saviour Iesous must have been most acceptable, suggests a writer in Philologische Wochenschrift.
In spite of attempts to justify the "translating" of the Father's Name and His Son's Name, it cannot be done. A person's name remains the same in all languages.
"The father of the Greek goddess Ieso was Asclepius, the deity of healing. The father of Asclepius was Apollo, the great sun-deity.
The name Iesous can be traced back to sun-worship. There is also a relationship to the Egyptian goddess Isis and her son Isu. According to Reallexikon der Agpyptischen Religionsgeschichte, the name of Isis appears in hieroglyphic inscriptions as ESU or ES. Isu and Esu sound exactly like the "Jesu" that the Saviour is called in the translated Scriptures of many languages.
Esus was a Gallic deity comparable to the Scandanavian Odin. The Greek abbreviation for Iesous is IHS, which is found on many inscriptions made by the Church during the middle Ages. IHS was the mystery name of Bacchus (Tammuz), another sun-deity. These are a few examples only."
We now know after looking at the evidence that Yeshua, Joshua,Iesous and Jesus refer to two different beings. One is the Son of God. The other is a pagan idol worshipped as a god. The old demons(nephilim) who promote themselves as gods convinced their patrons , through the evil tactics of their chief fallen angel, to infiltrate the "Way" and to steal,murder, manipulate and corrupt what was known as "the Kingdom of Heaven" on Earth out of the authority of the Desposyni and present us with a fraud/usurper .They manipulated and mixed truth with half truths,distortions and outright lies to give you an ultimate Lie.
The lie of Satan. The Paulist Roman Church. And then, of course, those that have made themselves complicit by sleeping with the whore. Those claiming orthodoxy.Those worshipping mammon.
For you all mostly slumbered and were misled through your own ignorance and complacency. And the stain must be removed.
How? The truth will set you free. You just have to be willing to learn the truth. It will set you free.